文献类型： 外文期刊

作者： Qi, Bowei ¹ ; Yang, Shenjiao ² ; Li, Dongwei ² ; Qin, Dandan ³ ; Zheng, Xingfei ³ ; Hu, Jianlin ³ ; Zhou, Xinguo ² ; Liu, Hongquan ⁴ ;

作者机构： 1.Hebei Agr Univ, Coll Urban & Rural Construct, Baoding 071002, Peoples R China

2.Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Farmland Irrigat, Xinxiang 453002, Peoples R China

3.Hubei Acad Agr Sci, Inst Food Crops, Wuhan 430064, Peoples R China

4.Minist Agr & Rural Affairs, Key Lab North China Water Saving Agr, Baoding 071001, Peoples R China

5.Hebei Agr Univ, Key Lab North China Crop Improvement & Regulat, Baoding 071001, Peoples R China

关键词： paddy field; subsurface drainage; straw drainage material; waterlogging; yield

期刊名称：AGRONOMY-BASEL （ 影响因子：3.4； 五年影响因子：3.8 ）

ISSN：

年卷期： 2025 年 15 卷 4 期

页码：

收录情况： SCI

摘要： As extreme rainfall events become more frequent, leading to increased waterlogging hazards, it is crucial to explore various drainage methods that can alleviate the adverse effects of waterlogging on crop growth, thus addressing challenges related to global food security. Field experiments were carried out to evaluate the impacts of different drainage technologies on waterlogging mitigation, rice growth, dry matter accumulation, and yield. The experimental setup included varying straw blind ditch spacings (2, 3, 4, and 5 m) and subsurface pipe drainage spacings (6, 9, and 12 m), with surface drainage serving as the control (CK). The findings revealed that, in comparison to pipe drainage treatments, blind ditch treatments enhanced subsurface drainage volume by 15.1%. Regarding groundwater levels and soil moisture, the soil moisture in the 0-90 cm soil layer and groundwater levels under the blind ditch treatments were 11.3% and 6.1% lower than those under the CK as well as 22.0% and 23.9% lower than the pipe drainage treatments, respectively. Subsurface drainage treatments led to significant improvements in rice yield, with blind ditch and pipe drainage treatments increasing the yield by 8.0% and 6.0% compared to the CK. Rice yields initially increased before decreasing as burial spacing reduced. The S3 treatment resulted in yield increases of 14.4%, 8.6%, and 10.7% over the S2, S4, and S5 treatments, respectively. The G9 treatment produced 3.6% and 10.4% higher yields compared to the G6 and G12 treatments. The highest rice yield, 7.501 Mgha-1, was achieved with a blind ditch spacing of 3 m. Compared to the S4 and S5 treatments, the yield per hectare for the S3 treatment was higher by 0.592 Mg and 0.726 Mg, while the input cost was higher by CNY 3038 and 4560, respectively. Path analysis indicated that root biomass made the largest direct contribution (0.517) to the increase in rice yield. Subsurface drainage contributed to the regulation of soil moisture, reducing leaf biomass while increasing stem biomass, which enabled the blind ditch treatments to produce optimal rice yield. These results provide a scientific basis for agricultural drainage in waterlogged areas.