您好，欢迎访问云南省农业科学院 机构知识库！

Diallel Analysis Models: A Comparison of Certain Genetic Statistics

文献类型： 外文期刊

作者： Yao, W. H. 1 ; Zhang, Y. D. 1 ; Kang, M. S. 3 ; Chen, H. M. 1 ; Liu, L. 1 ; Yu, L. J. 1 ; Fan, X. M. 1 ;

作者机构： 1.Yunnan Acad Agr Sci, Inst Food Crops, Kunming 650205, Yunnan, Peoples R China

2.Tian Rui Seed Co LTD, Kunming 650205, Yunnan, Peoples R China

3.Kansas State Univ, Dep Plant Pathol, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA

期刊名称：CROP SCIENCE （ 影响因子：2.319； 五年影响因子：2.631 ）

ISSN： 0011-183X

年卷期： 2013 年 53 卷 4 期

页码：

收录情况： SCI

摘要： Diallel analyses, although popular, raise key questions: (i) Do genetic statistics from different diallel methods with same and different sets of lines offer the same or similar information? and (ii) Would lack of information on reciprocal (REC) and maternal (MAT) effects in certain diallels put breeding programs at risk? To answer these questions, general (GCA) and specific combining ability (SCA), MAT, and REC effects were calculated from diallels with 12, 10, 8, 6, and 4 maize (Zea mays L.) parents. We found that with the same lines, the signs and magnitudes of GCA effects were similar and highly correlated among Griffing's Methods 1, 2, 3, and 4 and identical between Griffing's Method 4 and Gardner and Eberhart analysis III (G&EIII). The SCA effects from Griffing's Methods 1 to 4 were correlated. Griffing's Method 4 produced SCA effects identical to G&EII and G & EIII; SCA effects from Griffing's Methods 1 and 2 were upwardly biased because of inclusion of parental lines. Griffing's Method 3 (no parents included) was the best method among all six methods; it gave unbiased SCA estimates and information on MAT and REC effects. With different numbers of lines in diallel crosses, genetic statistics could serve as references across breeding programs because the signs of GCA and SCA effects were mostly same; however, caution must be exercised because some effects with opposite signs were detected. A diallel method that does not provide REC and MAT information could miss identifying superior hybrid(s). Because Methods 1 and 2 provided upwardly biased estimates of GCA and SCA effects, they are not recommended for estimation of GCA and SCA effects. We also concluded that Method 3 was the best diallel method; it provided unbiased estimates of SCA effects and also provided crucial REC and MAT effects, which are useful for proper selection of male and female parents in hybrid development.

  • 相关文献
作者其他论文 更多>>
置顶
购物车
反馈

© 京ICP备09089781号-29 主办单位：云南省农业科学院

学术资源： 中国农业科学院 农业专业知识服务系统 农科联盟资源共建共享平台 中国农业科技文献与信息服务平台 中国农业期刊集成服务平台