您好，欢迎访问中国农业科学院 机构知识库！

全部

  • 全部
  • 标题
  • 学者
  • 机构
  • 关键词

Quantifying physiological contributions to yield loss in response to planting date in short-season cotton under a cotton-wheat double-cropping system

文献类型： 外文期刊

作者： Guo, Simeng 1 ; Han, Yingchun 2 ; Wang, Guoping 2 ; Wu, Fengqi 1 ; Jia, Yaoyu 1 ; Chen, Jiale 2 ; Li, Xiaofei 2 ; Du, Wenli 2 ; Li, Yabing 1 ; Feng, Lu 1 ;

作者机构： 1.Zhengzhou Univ, Sch Agr Sci, Natl Key Lab Cotton Biobreeding & Integrated Utili, Zhengzhou Res Base, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, Peoples R China

2.Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Natl Key Lab Cotton Biobreeding & Integrated Utili, Inst Cotton Res, Anyang 455000, Henan, Peoples R China

关键词： Planting date; Physiological contributions; Yield loss; Short-season cotton

期刊名称：EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY （ 影响因子：5.2； 五年影响因子：5.9 ）

ISSN： 1161-0301

年卷期： 2024 年 154 卷

页码：

收录情况： SCI

摘要： Crop yield is primarily determined by physiological parameters, including light interception by the canopy (IPAR), radiation use efficiency (RUE), and harvest index (HI). However, little information is available about how these physiological parameters are impacted by planting date and what their contributions are to cotton yield loss. To evaluate the relative contribution of each physiological parameter to planting date-associated yield loss in cotton, an experiment was conducted during the 2019 to 2021 growing seasons at a field site in Anyang, Henan, China. Two contemporary cotton cultivars were grown in the field with four different planting dates (PDMAY10, PDMAY20, PDMAY30 and PDJUN10) for the growing seasons from 2019 to 2021. The measurements included climatic parameters, seed cotton yield, yield components, HI and biweekly leaf area index, light interception and biomass. First, seed cotton yield was significantly affected by the planting dates, with yields ranging from 1984 to 3388 kg ha-1, averaged across cultivars and years, while a significant difference between the first three planting dates was observed only in 2021. Second, the planting date significantly impacted the total light interception during the growing season (IPARtotal) and HI, while IPARtotal and HI decreased with the delayed planting date in all the years of the study. Compared to PDMAY10, IPARtotal was 0.34%, 13.2%, and 19.9% lower for PDMAY20, PDMAY30 and PDJUN10, respectively. Averaged across cultivars and years, PDMAY10 resulted in the highest HI value (0.28). The RUE gradually decreased as the planting date was delayed, but a significant difference in RUE between planting dates was observed only in 2021. Overall, among the three physiological yield-driving parameters, IPARtotal was a stronger contributor (46.9-47.0%) to the yield loss for PDJUN10 than PDMAY10 and PDMAY20. However, when compared to PDMAY30, HI was the greatest contributor, accounting for approximately 72.5% of the seed cotton yield loss for PDJUN10, followed by IPAR. We found that when cotton sowing in the Yellow River basin was postponed until June 10, the cotton yield was significantly reduced, and IPAR and HI were the main factors responsible for PDJUN10 yield loss on average. This study identified the most important functional traits for seed cotton yield response to planting date and has important reference value for stable cotton production.

  • 相关文献
作者其他论文 更多>>
置顶
购物车
反馈

© 京ICP备09089781号-29 主办单位：中国农业科学院

学术资源： 中国农业科学院 农业专业知识服务系统 农科联盟资源共建共享平台 中国农业科技文献与信息服务平台 中国农业期刊集成服务平台