您好,欢迎访问中国农业科学院 机构知识库!

KPRR: a novel machine learning approach for effectively capturing nonadditive effects in genomic prediction

文献类型: 外文期刊

作者: Li, Mianyan 1 ; Hall, Thomas 2 ; Machugh, David E. 2 ; Chen, Liang 5 ; Garrick, Dorian 6 ; Wang, Lixian 1 ; Zhao, Fuping 1 ;

作者机构: 1.Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Anim Sci, State Key Lab Anim Biotech Breeding, Yuanmingyuan West Rd, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China

2.Univ Coll Dublin, UCD Sch Agr & Food Sci, Anim Genom Lab, Dublin D04 V1W8, Ireland

3.Univ Coll Dublin, UCD Conway Inst Biomol & Biomed Res, Dublin D04 V1W8, Ireland

4.Univ Coll Dublin, UCD One Hlth Ctr, Dublin D04 V1W8, Ireland

5.Peking Univ, Affiliated High Sch, Daniwan Rd, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China

6.Theta Solut LLC, Hot Springs Rd, Katikati 3178, New Zealand

关键词: KPRR; polynomial kernel; machine learning; genomic prediction; nonadditive effects

期刊名称:BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS ( 影响因子:7.7; 五年影响因子:8.7 )

ISSN: 1467-5463

年卷期: 2025 年 26 卷 1 期

页码:

收录情况: SCI

摘要: Nonadditive genetic effects pose significant challenges to traditional genomic selection methods for quantitative traits. Machine learning approaches, particularly kernel-based methods, offer promising solutions to overcome these limitations. In this study, we developed a novel machine learning method, KPRR, which integrated a polynomial kernel into ridge regression to effectively capture nonadditive genetic effects. The predictive performance and computational efficiency of KPRR were evaluated using six datasets from various species, encompassing a total of 18 traits. All the traits were known to be influenced by additive, dominance, or epistatic genetic effects. We compared the performance of KPRR against six other genomic prediction methods: SPVR, BayesB, GBLUP, GEBLUP, GDBLUP, and DeepGS. For datasets dominated by additive effects, KPRR achieved superior prediction accuracies in the wheat dataset and comparable performance in the cattle dataset when compared to GBLUP. For datasets influenced by dominance effects, KPRR matched GDBLUP in accuracies in the pig dataset and outperformed GDBLUP in the sheep dataset. For datasets exhibiting epistatic effects, KPRR outperformed other methods in some traits, while BayesB showed superior performance in others. Incorporating nonadditive effects into a GBLUP model led to overall improvements in prediction accuracy. Regarding computational efficiency, KPRR was consistently the fastest, while BayesB was the slowest. Our findings demonstrated that KPRR provided significant advantages over traditional genomic prediction methods in capturing nonadditive effects.

  • 相关文献
作者其他论文 更多>>