您好,欢迎访问中国农业科学院 机构知识库!

The fluxes of CO2 from grazed and fenced temperate steppe during two drought years on the Inner Mongolia Plateau, China

文献类型: 外文期刊

作者: Wang, Y. F. 1 ; Cui, X. Y. 1 ; Hao, Y. B. 1 ; Mei, X. R. 2 ; Yu, G. R. 3 ; Huang, X. Z. 1 ; Kang, X. M. 4 ; Zhou, X. Q. 4 ;

作者机构: 1.Chinese Acad Sci, Grad Univ, Coll Life Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China

2.CAAS, Inst Environm & Sustainable Dev Agr, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China

3.CAS, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Chinese Ecosyst Res Network, Synth Res Ctr, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China

4.Chinese Acad Sci, Grad Univ, Coll Resource & Environm, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China

关键词: Eddy covariance;Net ecosystem exchange;Leymus chinensis steppe;Drought

期刊名称:SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT ( 影响因子:7.963; 五年影响因子:7.842 )

ISSN: 0048-9697

年卷期: 2011 年 410 卷

页码:

收录情况: SCI

摘要: The CO2 flux was measured by the eddy covariance method on a temperate Leymus chinensis steppe over a period of 17 months spanning two consecutive growing seasons. The amount of precipitation was nearly normal, but it was low in the early and high in the late growing period in 2006. In the 2007 growing season, the amount of precipitation was about 45% less than the multi-year average and more evenly distributed. Comparisons were made between a moderately grazed site and a 28-year-old fenced site. The maximum instantaneous CO2 release and uptake rates were 0.12 (May) and 0.11 mg CO2 m(-2) s(-1) (July) at the fenced site, and 0.11 and 0.16 mg CO2 m(-2) s(-1) (both in July) at the grazed site. In both growing seasons, the grazed site always had a higher daily uptake rate or lower release rate than the fenced site. The grazed site was a CO2 sink during the growing season of 2007 and a CO2 source in the growing season of 2006, whereas the fenced site was a CO2 source in both seasons. Lower precipitation decreased CO2 loss during the growing season more in the grazed site than in the fenced site, mainly because of depression of total ecosystem respiration (R-e) in the former and stimulation in the latter. During the dormant season (from October to April), the fenced and grazed sites released 60.0 and 32.4 g of C per m(2), respectively. Path analysis showed that temperature had the greatest effect on daily variation of ecosystem CO2 exchange during the growing seasons at the two study sites. The results suggest that decrease of precipitation and/or increase of temperature will likely promote C loss from L chinensis steppes, whether fenced or grazed, and that a grazed site is more sensitive. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

  • 相关文献

[1]Comparison of multi-level water use efficiency between plastic film partially mulched and non-mulched croplands at eastern Loess Plateau of China. Gong, Daozhi,Mei, Xurong,Hao, Weiping,Wang, Hanbo,Mei, Xurong,Caylor, Kelly K..

[2]Predominance of Precipitation and Temperature Controls on Ecosystem CO2 Exchange in Zoige Alpine Wetlands of Southwest China. Hao, Yan Bin,Cui, Xiao Yong,Wang, Yan Fen,Kang, Xiao Ming,Mei, Xu Rong,Wu, Ning,Luo, Peng,Zhu, Dan. 2011

[3]Carbon sequestration in relation to shrub size in the desert ecosystem. Decao Niu,Hongyang Chen,Shigao Jiang,Li Liu,Hongrong Zhang,Hua Fu. 2013

[4]Technological challenges to irrigation scheduling -Crop Coefficients, ET_o forecasts, and in-situ ETmeasurements. Richard L. Snyder,Thomas M. Shapland,Frank E. Anderson,Zhenwei Song,Atef Swelam,Ruben Moratiel. 2010

[5]CO(2)H(2)O and energy exchange of an Inner Mongolia steppe ecosystem during a dry and wet year. Wang, Yanfen,Cui, Xiaoyong,Zhou, Xiaoqi,Niu, Haishan,Hao, Yanbin,Huang, Xiangzhong,Cui, Xiaoyong,Mei, Xurong. 2008

[6]Energy balance and partitioning in partial plastic mulched and non-mulched maize fields on the Loess Plateau of China. Feng, Yu,Gong, Daozhi,Mei, Xurong,Hao, Weiping,Tang, Dahua,Cui, Ningbo,Cui, Ningbo.

[7]Carbon budget of a rainfed spring maize cropland with straw returning on the Loess Plateau, China. Hao, Weiping,Mei, Xurong,Gao, Xiang,Gu, Fengxue,Li, Haoru,Gong, Daozhi,Mao, Lili,Zhang, Zuguang.

[8]Comparison of satellite-based evapotranspiration models over terrestrial ecosystems in China. Chen, Yang,Xia, Jiangzhou,Feng, Jinming,Wang, Kaicun,Yuan, Wenping,Chen, Yang,Xia, Jiangzhou,Liang, Shunlin,Li, Xianglan,Wang, Kaicun,Chen, Yang,Xia, Jiangzhou,Liang, Shunlin,Li, Xianglan,Wang, Kaicun,Liang, Shunlin,Feng, Jinming,Ma, Zhuguo,Zhao, Tianbao,Fisher, Joshua B.,Li, Xin,Wen, Jun,Liu, Shuguang,Miyata, Akira,Mu, Qiaozhen,Sun, Liang,Tang, Jianwei,Zhang, Qiang,Xue, Yueju,Yu, Guirui,Zha, Tonggang,Zhang, Li,Zhao, Liang,Yuan, Wenping.

[9]Geographical statistical assessments of carbon fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems of China: Results from upscaling network observations. Zhu, Xian-Jin,Yu, Gui-Rui,He, Hong-Lin,Wang, Qiu-Feng,Chen, Zhi,Gao, Yan-Ni,Wang, Hui-Min,Shi, Pei-Li,Zhao, Feng-Hua,Fu, Yu-Ling,Wen, Xue-Fa,Liu, Ying-Chun,Zhang, Lei-Ming,Zhang, Li,Su, Wen,Li, Sheng-Gong,Sun, Xiao-Min,Wang, Yan-Fen,Liu, Ying-Chun,Zhang, Yi-Ping,Zhang, Jun-Hui,Yan, Jun-Hua,Zhou, Guang-Sheng,Jia, Bing-Rui,Chen, Shi-Ping,Xiang, Wen-Hua,Li, Ying-Nian,Zhao, Liang,Xin, Xiao-Ping,Wang, Yu-Ying,Tong, Cheng-Li.

[10]Comparison of ET partitioning and crop coefficients between partial plastic mulched and non -mulched maize fields. Gong, Daozhi,Mei, Xurong,Hao, Weiping,Wang, Hanbo,Gong, Daozhi,Mei, Xurong,Hao, Weiping,Wang, Hanbo,Mei, Xurong,Caylor, Kelly K..

[11]Spatiotemporal Characteristics Analysis of Environmental Sensitivity of Drought Disaster in Xilingol Grassland. Qiaofeng Zhang,Guixiang Liu,Hongbo Yu,Shan Yu,Yuhai Bao. 2018

[12]Analysis of Drought Characteristic in Sunit Prairie Based on Precipitation Anomaly Percentage during 2000-2015. Xiaodong Sun,Guixiang Liu,Yuhai Bao,Xiaode Zhang. 2016

[13]Research on Temporal and Spatial Dynamic of Maize Drought Using Remote Sensing: A Case on Shuanghe Farm of Beijing. Yunxiang Jin,Sijian Zhao,Wei Sun,Lei Xu,Qian Nie,Qiao Zhang. 2016

[14]Effect of soil salinity, soil drought, and their combined action on the biochemical characteristics of cotton roots. Zhang, Lei,Chen, Binglin,Zhang, Guowei,Li, Jianliang,Wang, Youhua,Meng, Yali,Zhou, Zhiguo,Zhang, Lei. 2013

[15]An NAM Domain Gene, GhNAC79, Improves Resistance to Drought Stress in Upland Cotton. Guo, Yaning,Yu, Shuxun,Jia, Xiaoyun,Dou, Lingling,Yu, Shuxun,Guo, Yaning,Pang, Chaoyou,Ma, Qifeng,Zhao, Fengli,Gu, Lijiao,Wei, Hengling,Wang, Hantao,Fan, Shuli,Su, Junji. 2017

[16]MicroRNAs associated with drought response in the pulse crop common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Wu, Jing,Wang, Lanfen,Wang, Shumin. 2017

[17]Analysis of Drought Characteristic in Sunit Prairie Based on Precipitation Anomaly Percentage during 2000-2015. Sun, Xiaodong,Liu, Guixiang,Zhang, Xiaode,Bao, Yuhai. 2016

[18]De novo assembly of the desert tree Haloxylon ammodendron (C. A. Mey.) based on RNA-Seq data provides insight into drought response, gene discovery and marker identification. Long, Yan,Zhang, Jingwen,Tian, Xinjie,Wu, Shanshan,Pei, Xin Wu,Zhang, Qiong,Zhang, Jianping,Dang, Zhanhai. 2014

[19]Expression of TERF1 in rice regulates expression of stress-responsive genes and enhances tolerance to drought and high-salinity. Gao, Shumei,Zhang, Haiwen,Tian, Yun,Li, Fang,Zhang, Zhijin,Chen, Xiaoliang,Huang, Rongfeng,Gao, Shumei,Zhang, Haiwen,Zhang, Zhijin,Huang, Rongfeng,Tian, Yun,Li, Fang,Lu, Xiangyang. 2008

[20]De novo sequencing and analysis of root transcriptome using 454 pyrosequencing to discover putative genes associated with drought tolerance in Ammopiptanthus mongolicus. Zhou, Yijun,Gao, Fei,Liu, Ran,Feng, Jinchao,Gao, Fei,Li, Hongjie. 2012

作者其他论文 更多>>